Section 06

The Science Library

Everything the rest of this site cites lives here: 20 peer-reviewed studies, official reports, and position papers. Each entry links out to the source and back to every article that uses it, so you can audit any claim in both directions.

How sources get in (and thrown out): see our citations and corrections policy. Want the skills to judge studies yourself? Read how to read a nutrition study without getting fooled.

Peer-reviewed studies

study

Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat

Bouvard, V., et al. (IARC Monograph Working Group) (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00444-1

The WHO cancer agency's classification of processed meat as a Group 1 carcinogen and red meat as Group 2A. The classification grades strength of evidence, not size of risk; the absolute risk increase is modest.

study

Healthful and Unhealthful Plant-Based Diets and the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in US Adults

Satija, A., et al. (2017) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.047

Follows about 209,000 adults and finds plant-based diets built on whole foods are linked to lower coronary heart disease risk, while plant-based diets heavy in refined foods are not. Quality matters, not just the label.

study

Food groups and risk of all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

Schwingshackl, L., et al. (2017) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.117.153148

Dose-response meta-analysis across food groups: higher intakes of whole grains, vegetables, fruit, nuts, and legumes track with lower all-cause mortality; higher red and processed meat intake tracks with higher mortality.

study

Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017

GBD 2017 Diet Collaborators (Afshin, A., et al.) (2019) · The Lancet · DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8

The Global Burden of Disease analysis of diet and death worldwide. The biggest dietary killers it identifies are diets low in whole grains, fruits, nuts, and vegetables, alongside high sodium.

study

Risks of ischaemic heart disease and stroke in meat eaters, fish eaters, and vegetarians over 18 years of follow-up: results from the prospective EPIC-Oxford study

Tong, T. Y. N., et al. (2019) · BMJ · DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l4897

EPIC-Oxford cohort of about 48,000 people: vegetarians and vegans had lower ischaemic heart disease risk than meat eaters, alongside a smaller increase in haemorrhagic stroke. An honest picture with findings in both directions.

study

Carbohydrate quality and human health: a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Reynolds, A., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31809-9

Commissioned by the WHO: people eating the most fiber (mostly from whole plant foods) had 15 to 30% lower all-cause mortality and lower incidence of heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes, and colorectal cancer.

Reports, position papers & preprints

preprint

Making AI Less "Thirsty": Uncovering and Addressing the Secret Water Footprint of AI Models

Li, P., Yang, J., Islam, M. A. & Ren, S. (2023) · arXiv (preprint)

The most-cited estimate of AI water use. Its abstract reports that training GPT-3 in US data centers directly evaporated about 700,000 litres of freshwater; the paper also estimates roughly 500 ml consumed per 10 to 50 medium-length responses. A preprint, so treat the numbers as estimates; we use it because public AI water data is scarce.

position

Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Vegetarian Diets

Melina, V., Craig, W. & Levin, S. (2016) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.09.025

The largest US dietetics body's position: appropriately planned vegetarian and vegan diets are healthful, nutritionally adequate, and appropriate for all life stages, including pregnancy, infancy, and athletes.

Official reference pages

reference

FSIS Guideline on Substantiating Animal-Raising or Environment-Related Labeling Claims

USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service (2024) · USDA FSIS Guideline 2024-0006

The US government's own guideline for how claims like "free range" and "humanely raised" get onto packages: companies substantiate them with paperwork submitted to USDA, not through on-farm inspections. Reading it is the fastest way to see how little most labels guarantee.